Back to Report
2009 ANNUAL MONITORING PROGRAM
LIBRARY INDEX
01-Lake and Watershed Information
02-Ambient Monitoring
Program Background
03-Methodology for 2009 Program
04-Department of Water
Environment Protection Actions: 2009
05-Tributary Monitoring Results
06-Onondaga Lake Results:
Physical Parameters and Habitat Conditions
07-Onondaga Lake Results:
Chemical Parameters
08-Onondaga Lake Results: Biology
09-Seneca River conditions
10-2009 Analytical data disk
11-Supporting Documents
- 01-Lake and Watershed Information
- 02-Ambient Monitoring Program Background
- 03-Methodology for 2009 Program
- 04-Department of Water Environment Protection Actions: 2009
- 05-Tributary
Monitoring Results
- 5.1-Tributaries
USGS flow records, 2009
- 5.2-Concentration data: flow-weighted and
annual averages
- 5.3-Loading data
- 5.4-Onondaga Creek - Route 20 and Spencer Street
data
- 5.5-Onondaga
Creek at Spencer Street, hydrograph with precipitation
- 5.6-Onondaga
Creek at Spencer Street, storm events data
- 5.7-Onondaga
Creek at Spencer Street, storm events analysis
- 5.8-Dry and wet weather tributary bacteria
analyses
- 5.8.1-Tributaries
fecal coliform bacteria loading, wet and dry years
- 5.8.2-Tributaries
fecal coliform bacteria, high and low flow conditions by site
- 5.8.3-Fecal
coliform bacteria during summer base flow, 1999-2009
- 5.8.4-Onondaga
Creek fecal coliform bacteria geometric means, 1993-2009
- 5.8.5-Harbor
Brook fecal coliform bacteria geometric means, 1993-2009
- 5.8.6-Ninemile
Creek and Ley Creek fecal coliform bacteria geometric means, 1993-2009
- 5.8.7-Tributaries
(Onondaga Creek, Harbor Brook, Ley Creek, and Ninemile Creek) fecal
coliform bacteria during wet and dry weather, 2009
- 06-Onondaga Lake
Results: Physical
Parameters and Habitat Conditions
- 07-Onondaga Lake
Results: Chemical
Parameters
- 7.1-Dissolved Oxygen- includes buoy data
- 7.2-Nitrogen
- 7.3-
Lake summer average total phosphorus concentrations, 1990-2009
- 7.4-Other
parameters
- 7.5-Low-level mercury (Hg) results
- 7.6-North and South Deep stations paired
sample comparison
- 7.6.1-North
and South Deep comparison - description
- 7.6.2-Comparison
of South and North data, April 9, 2009
- 7.6.3-Comparison
of South and North data, June 16, 2009
- 7.6.4-Comparison
of South and North data, September 22, 2009
- 7.6.5-Comparison
of South and North data, November 17, 2009
- 7.6.6-Statistical
comparison of average results of parameters, 1999-2009
- 7.6.7-Summary
of parameters with statistically significant differences, 1999-2009
- 08-Onondaga Lake
Results: Biology
- 8.1-Lake
fecal coliform and E. coli bacteria compliance, 2009
- 8.2-Chlorophyll-a
- 8.3-Lower Trophic
- 8.4-Macroalgae
- 8.5-Macrophytes
- 8.6-Dreissenid (zebra and quagga) mussels
- 8.7-Fish Community
- 8.7.0-
AMP 2009 Fisheries Technical Appendix
- 8.7.1-Alewife Hydroacoustics Survey
- 8.7.2-Angler Catch
- 8.7.3-Community Structure
- 8.7.3.1-Catch rates
- 8.7.3.1.1-Electrofishing
catch rates of largemouth and smallmouth bass in Onondaga Lake,
2000-2009
- 8.7.3.1.2-Whole
lake electrofishing relative abundance in 2009
- 8.7.3.1.3-Catch
per unit effort (CPUE) trends of select species by electrofishing,
2000-2009
- 8.7.3.1.4-Gill
net relative abundance of fish species, 2009
- 8.7.3.1.5-Whole
lake electrofishing CPUE, total catch, and relative abundance in 2009
- 8.7.3.1.6-Whole
lake electrofishing number netted and missed, 2009
- 8.7.3.1.7-Individual
stratum (5) electrofishing CPUE and relative abundance in 2009
- 8.7.3.1.8-Individual
transect (24) electrofishing CPUE in 2009
- 8.7.3.1.9-Largemouth
and smallmouth bass fingerling and yearling catch rates from
electrofishing, 2009
- 8.7.3.1.10-Gill
net CPUE by location, time period, and species, 2009
- 8.7.3.1.11-Population
trends of fish species from electrofishing results
- 8.7.3.2-Guilds
- 8.7.3.2.1-Guild
and tolerance designations for species collected from surveys in Onondaga
Lake, 2000-2009
- 8.7.3.2.2-Trophic
guild CPUE and relative abundance from electrofishing data, with and
without clupeids, 2009
- 8.7.3.2.3-Trophic
guild trends from electrofishing data, with and without clupeids,
2000-2009
- 8.7.3.2.4-Thermal
guild CPUE and relative abundance from electrofishing data, with and
without clupeids, 2009
- 8.7.3.2.5-Thermal
guild trends from electrofishing data, with and without clupeids,
2000-2009
- 8.7.3.2.6-Reproductive
guild CPUE and relative abundance based on young-of-year taxa in seine
hauls, with and without clupeids, 2009
- 8.7.3.2.7-Relative
contribution of pollution tolerance categories for electrofishing
events, 2009
- 8.7.3.2.8-Population
trends of trophic guilds from electrofishing results
- 8.7.3.2.9-Ten-year
(2000-2009) trend analysis (percent change per year) and level of
significance of trophic guilds
- 8.7.4-Size and growth
- 8.7.4.1-Adults
- 8.7.4.2-Young Of Year (YOY)
- 8.7.4.3-Deformities, Erosions, Lesions,
Tumors, Fungus, and/or Malignancies (DELTFM)
- 8.7.4.4-Species Richness and Diversity
- 8.7.4.4.1-Gill
nets Shannon Diversity Index for each stratum, with clupeids, 2009
- 8.7.4.4.2-Electrofishing
Shannon Diversity Index, whole lake and by stratum, with and without
clupeids, 2009
- 8.7.4.4.3-Electrofishing
Shannon-Weiner diversity spring, fall and annual trends, with and
without clupeids, 2000-2009
- 8.7.4.4.4-Species
richness in whole lake and by stratum from electrofishing, 2009
- 8.7.4.4.5-Species
richness in whole lake and by stratum from gill nets, 2009
- 8.7.4.4.6-Electrofishing
species richness in ''all fish'' transects from 2000-2009
- 8.7.4.4.7-Onondaga
Lake Fish Community Structure, 2000-2009 (Clupeids Included)
- 8.7.4.4.8-Onondaga Lake Fish
Community Structure, 2000-2009 (Clupeids Excluded)
- 8.7.5-Habitat
Conditions: Data Visualization Tool (DVT) and Fish Space
- 8.7.6-Mercury in Fish Flesh
- 8.7.7-Reproduction
- 8.7.7.2-Young of the Year (YOY)
- 8.7.7.2.1-YOY
catch per unit effort (CPUE) for each species for the whole year from
each stratum and the entire lake, 2009
- 8.7.7.2.2-YOY
mean CPUE for each species from each site by seine haul, 2009
- 8.7.7.2.3-YOY
CPUE in each stratum during each sampling event for each species, by
seine haul, 2009
- 8.7.7.2.4-Mean
CPUE of incidental catch of non-YOY species for entire lake, 2009
- 8.7.7.2.5-YOY
CPUE trends, 2000-2009
- 8.7.7.2.6-Community
structure of YOY captured in seine hauls, 2000-2009
- 8.7.7.2.7-YOY
relative abundance, with and without clupeids, 2009 (graph)
- 8.7.7.2.8-YOY
relative abundance for each species from each stratum and the entire
lake, with and without clupeids, 2009 (table)
- 8.7.7.2.9-Shannon
Diversity Index for YOY fish collected in seine hauls in 2009
- 8.7.7.2.10-YOY
whole lake diversity from seine hauls, 2000-2009
- 8.7.7.2.11-Presence/absence
of early life history stages and adults, 2009
- 8.7.7.2.12-Presence/absence
and CPUE of larvae and YOY by species, 2000-2009
- 8.7.7.3-Nesting Survey
- 09-Seneca
River conditions
- 10-2009 Analytical data
disk
- 11-Supporting
Documents
Back
to Report